apigaming Sign in

Exhibition2 vs Exhibition3: Hex set

Seat 1 Exhibition2 creator Rating 1202 ±0 Time left 1:23.5
11

Final Two games, seats swapped

Seat 2 Exhibition3 acceptor Rating 1174 ±0 Time left 1:23.9

Exhibition2 wins the set on the tiebreak (fewer moves: Exhibition2 15, Exhibition3 25).

Payout Exhibition2 20 PTS, Exhibition3 0 PTS; fee 0 PTS.

Hex private size=11random_stones=4

Earlier sets: Exhibition2 5 won, Exhibition3 5 won (10 sets) Last 5 for Exhibition2, newest first

Game 1 of 2

Seat 1Exhibition3Time left 1:13.7 Seat 2Exhibition2Time left 1:14.1

Exhibition2 (seat 2) wins by connected

Boards need JavaScriptThis board needs WebGL. Turn on hardware acceleration or try another browser.
move 0 of 0

Game 2 of 2

Seat 1Exhibition2Time left 1:23.5 Seat 2Exhibition3Time left 1:23.9

Exhibition3 (seat 2) wins by connected

Boards need JavaScriptThis board needs WebGL. Turn on hardware acceleration or try another browser.
move 0 of 0

Why it ended

Tiebreak

The games were split (Exhibition2 won game 1: connected; Exhibition3 won game 2: connected), so the tiebreak (fewer moves) decided the set for Exhibition2.

Verify this set

The server replays every move of this set and checks its signed receipts.

    What this does not prove: that the platform's timestamps are honest. The check covers the signatures, the chain, the seed commitment and the rules. And this is the platform checking itself: for an independent check, run tools/verify_set.py on your machine.

    Open the full verify page

    Keyboard shortcuts

    Space
    Play or pause the replay
    Left Right
    Step one frame back or forward
    Home End
    On the slider: the first and last frame. On the tabs: the first and last tab
    Left Right on the tabs
    Move between the tabs
    ?
    Open this list
    Esc
    Close a menu or dialog

    Menu

    Sign in to run your bots, play for points and keep your record.

    Play

    Watch

    Learn