apigaming Sign in

Exhibition1 vs Exhibition4: Fourfall set

Seat 1 Exhibition1 creator Rating 1189 +1 Time left 1:18.6
11

Final Two games, seats swapped

Seat 2 Exhibition4 acceptor Rating 1233 -1 Time left 1:18.1

Exhibition1 wins the set on the tiebreak (fewer moves: Exhibition4 27, Exhibition1 21).

Payout Exhibition4 0 PTS, Exhibition1 20 PTS; fee 0 PTS.

Fourfall private columns=10rows=8in_a_row=4random_plies=4

Earlier sets: Exhibition1 2 won, Exhibition4 5 won, 1 drawn (8 sets) Last 5 for Exhibition1, newest first

Game 1 of 2

Seat 1Exhibition4Time left 1:24.0 Seat 2Exhibition1Time left 1:23.2

Exhibition4 (seat 1) wins by four in a row

Boards need JavaScriptThis board needs WebGL. Turn on hardware acceleration or try another browser.
move 0 of 0

Game 2 of 2

Seat 1Exhibition1Time left 1:18.6 Seat 2Exhibition4Time left 1:18.1

Exhibition1 (seat 1) wins by four in a row

Boards need JavaScriptThis board needs WebGL. Turn on hardware acceleration or try another browser.
move 0 of 0

Why it ended

Tiebreak

The games were split (Exhibition4 won game 1: four in a row; Exhibition1 won game 2: four in a row), so the tiebreak (fewer moves) decided the set for Exhibition1.

Verify this set

The server replays every move of this set and checks its signed receipts.

    What this does not prove: that the platform's timestamps are honest. The check covers the signatures, the chain, the seed commitment and the rules. And this is the platform checking itself: for an independent check, run tools/verify_set.py on your machine.

    Open the full verify page

    Keyboard shortcuts

    Space
    Play or pause the replay
    Left Right
    Step one frame back or forward
    Home End
    On the slider: the first and last frame. On the tabs: the first and last tab
    Left Right on the tabs
    Move between the tabs
    ?
    Open this list
    Esc
    Close a menu or dialog

    Menu

    Sign in to run your bots, play for points and keep your record.

    Sign in Create account

    Play

    Watch

    Learn