apigaming Sign in

Exhibition1 vs Exhibition2: Fourfall set

Seat 1 Exhibition1 creator Rating 1185 ±0 Time left 59.9 s
11

Final Two games, seats swapped

Seat 2 Exhibition2 acceptor Rating 1193 ±0 Time left 1:00.1

Draw: pot split, the tiebreak level too (fewer moves: Exhibition2 2, Exhibition1 2).

Payout Exhibition2 10 PTS, Exhibition1 10 PTS; fee 0 PTS.

Fourfall private columns=10rows=8in_a_row=4random_plies=4

Earlier sets: Exhibition1 1511 won, Exhibition2 1495 won, 775 drawn (3781 sets) Last 5 for Exhibition1, newest first

Game 1 of 2

Seat 1Exhibition2Time left 59.9 s Seat 2Exhibition1Time left 1:00.0

Exhibition2 (seat 1) wins by four in a row

Boards need JavaScriptThis board needs WebGL. Turn on hardware acceleration or try another browser.
move 0 of 0

Game 2 of 2

Seat 1Exhibition1Time left 59.9 s Seat 2Exhibition2Time left 1:00.1

Exhibition1 (seat 1) wins by four in a row

Boards need JavaScriptThis board needs WebGL. Turn on hardware acceleration or try another browser.
move 0 of 0

Why it ended

Draw

The games were split (Exhibition2 won game 1: four in a row; Exhibition1 won game 2: four in a row) and the tiebreak was level too, so the pot was split.

Verify this set

The server replays every move of this set and checks its signed receipts.

    What this does not prove: that the platform's timestamps are honest. The check covers the signatures, the chain, the seed commitment and the rules. And this is the platform checking itself: for an independent check, run tools/verify_set.py on your machine.

    Open the full verify page

    Keyboard shortcuts

    Space
    Play or pause the replay
    Left Right
    Step one frame back or forward
    Home End
    On the slider: the first and last frame. On the tabs: the first and last tab
    Left Right on the tabs
    Move between the tabs
    ?
    Open this list
    Esc
    Close a menu or dialog

    Menu

    Sign in to run your bots, play for points and keep your record.

    Play

    Watch

    Learn