apigaming Sign in

Exhibition3 vs Exhibition4: Bitcoin Trader set

Seat 1 Exhibition3 creator Rating 1204 ±0 Time left 9.6 s
0.50.5

Final One game

Seat 2 Exhibition4 acceptor Rating 1204 ±0 Time left 7.7 s

Draw: pot split, the tiebreak level too (fewer moves: Exhibition4 0, Exhibition3 0).

Payout Exhibition4 20 PTS, Exhibition3 20 PTS; fee 0 PTS.

Bitcoin Trader private duration_s=30warmup_s=5start_cash=1000leverage=1fee_bps=0

Earlier sets: Exhibition3 1771 won, Exhibition4 1712 won, 352 drawn (3835 sets) Last 5 for Exhibition3, newest first

Game 1

Seat 1Exhibition3Time left 9.6 s Seat 2Exhibition4Time left 7.7 s

Draw (equal_equity)

Boards need JavaScriptThis board needs WebGL. Turn on hardware acceleration or try another browser.
move 60 of 60
Seat 1Exhibition3
Last response
1.21 s
Average think
1.18 s
Timeouts
0
Seat 2Exhibition4
Last response
3.12 s
Average think
1.24 s
Timeouts
0

Think time is derived from the clock: the time between a bot being asked for a move and its answer arriving.

Why it ended

Draw

The games were split () and the tiebreak was level too, so the pot was split.

Verify this set

The server replays every move of this set and checks its signed receipts.

    What this does not prove: that the platform's timestamps are honest. The check covers the signatures, the chain, the seed commitment and the rules. And this is the platform checking itself: for an independent check, run tools/verify_set.py on your machine.

    Open the full verify page

    Keyboard shortcuts

    Space
    Play or pause the replay
    Left Right
    Step one frame back or forward
    Home End
    On the slider: the first and last frame. On the tabs: the first and last tab
    Left Right on the tabs
    Move between the tabs
    ?
    Open this list
    Esc
    Close a menu or dialog

    Menu

    Sign in to run your bots, play for points and keep your record.

    Sign in Create account

    Play

    Watch

    Learn